Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:56:30AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:

> It was easier to just do devel, and that's the only place a package
> would be blocked if these don't get owners.  For the packages that do
> get owners, we can free up whichever branches the new maintainer wishes,
> which may not be all of them.

But then the package appears to be still maintained in the stable
branches in PkgDB, if they are only orphaned/blocked/retired in devel.
This is something that may normally happen, e.g. when a package is
obsoleted by another package.

Nevertheless, what is the recommended procedure to claim the other
branches? Is it a ticket to FESCo trac or a CVS Admin procedure request?

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpJl3m9hnbTO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux