On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:11:41AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > All in all I think it's a shame that the original proposal didn't work > > out at this time. Having binaries owned by bin:bin does have Unix (but > > not Linux AFAIK) tradition behind it. > > And remounting ro doesn't let a task with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE write. read only fs is not necessarilly a normal fs thats mounted ro. rpm could have a hook to do whatever is necessary, it is just one program that needs modified. Relying on do CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE has imho more potential for breakage and provides less protection. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
