Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:39:38AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:40 +0100
> Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:42:58PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:52:12 +0100
> > > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The list of packages you announced that are going to be orphaned
> > > > and the list of packages that were orphaned are not the same.
> > > > recordmydesktop was on the to-be-orphaned list but afaics was not
> > > > orphaned and also was not mentioned in your list about which
> > > > provenpackager fixed which package.
> > > 
> > > Odd. Not sure why it wasn't there. 
> > > 
> > > I mailed the maintainer and can orphan it. 
> > 
> > It is still not orphaned afaics.
> 
> Sorry about that, was hoping I would get a reply. 

Oh, then I misunderstood, I thought you got a reply saying that you can
orphan it. I will then go on with a non responsive maintainer procedure.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpeupdRZWsxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux