On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 12:25 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> If we do that check before the alpha release that should let us track >> down >> awol maintainers and unmaintained pkgs pretty easily, I think. >> >> thoughts? > > There's trivial packages which simply don't really need touching. I just > updated congruity for the first time in a couple of months. it got a > (very trivial) upstream release; upstream could easily have held off and > I'd have had absolutely no reason to touch it. it's a simple package > that just does what it's supposed to do, it doesn't need much TLC. I > wouldn't want to be considered 'unresponsive' just because it hadn't > needed touching for an arbitrary period. which is why All we're suggesting is filing a bug and/or some other kind of notification that says "are you alive". -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
