On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 15:12 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > I doubt this very much. Many people don't report the bugs when the app > crashes but later, many reports in a row. Most of my reports read "I > have no idea what I was doing when foo crashed", even if they > submitted > it straight after the crash. Only 2 out of ~40 contained the > information > I needed to reproduce the crash reliably (as a site note: both are > fixed, so the number of crashes fixed it 4 but not 3 as I wrote in my > initial mail. 4/40 is still a bad percentage) 'Bad' in what way? it's probably 4 - almost certainly 2 or 3 - more than you would have fixed if abrt didn't exist. I used to work in a supermarket, and noticed that it'd be much easier to run a supermarket smoothly if there were no customers. They do insist on coming in and messing up the shelves and dirtying up the floors and asking stupid questions. In much the same way, it'd be ever so much easier to run a distribution really *efficiently* if no-one ever used it...:) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
