On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:23:08PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > That sounds good as long as AutoQA is reliable, not generating false > positives. I'd still also suggest that we have a rule drop all > packages reported by the FTBFS tests which aren't fixed by time of > Beta. I would like to have this with a slight modificiation. If a package FTBFS for at least a certain amount of time (e.g. two weeks) at the time of Beta, then every provenpackager may just fix the bugs for another certain amount of time (e.g. another two weeks) and if nobody fixes it then it should be dropped. Or maybe we could have some kind of "neglected packages task force", that may just in general fix bugs in packages that are not fixed by the original maintainer. The advantage over becoming co-maintainer of certain packages is then, that one does not get all the noise about bugs that are already been taken care of by the original maintainer. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgp2lfyBy7zJQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
