Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> How much do we adhere to our Packaging Guidelines for static libraries?
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries

> Mispackaged -static libraries:
>     mysql-devel  from  mysql-5.1.42-2.fc13.src.rpm
>     postgresql-devel  from  postgresql-8.4.2-1.fc13.src.rpm

As far as these two go, I think it's just a matter of the specfiles
dating from years before we had any such guideline, and not revisiting
the point since then.  I don't have any particular objection to removing
the static versions of their libraries.  On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...

			regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux