Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/2010 05:48 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...

Isn't that a chicken/egg problem?

It really is. I mean, we could create the "Packaging Police" to run
around and enforce the guidelines by force (either by fixing them
manually,
I would not want to call it a "packaging police", but a "tag team" which fixes the packages

== IMO, that's the way to go.

or by threatening maintainers until they do it), but is that
really what we want?

Yes, people have had enough time to fix their packages - It's time for action.

Ralf

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux