On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> On the other hand, with the > >>> guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to > >>> comply with it ... > >> > >> Isn't that a chicken/egg problem? > > > It really is. > > Well, fwiw, I have to fix the same two spec files for the %define > problem, so I'm going to take care of this today while it's fresh in > mind. But there's a general issue that new things keep getting added > to the packaging guidelines and there's no very good mechanism to > detect whether existing packages ever get updated to comply. > > regards, tom lane > In the future when we have AutoQA online we'll be able to add new tests for new guidelines and alert maintainers who's specs fall out of.. er.. spec. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
