Re: ABRT considered painful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:34:47 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories is
down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in working
directory and there is not much ABRT can do about this.
...
Well this "yum issue" is by design .. reporting it does not have much
sense because Seth do not want to change/fix it.

Found this flameware at this open Bug:
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528014

What flames? I said no and that - if abrt wants to do otherwise they can use the yum api to do so.

How is that a flame?

-sv


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux