Re: Mono.Cecil & monodevelop-debugger-mdb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current Mono.Cecil.
> And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not
> surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community?

Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account?  It's their
software, after all.  And doesn't Java work in a similar way?

You can't expect everyone to change their software design to work for
Fedora, even if it has disadvantages.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux