On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:04:59 +0100, Kevin wrote: > > What's wrong with ABRT? > > My main beef with it is that it reports its crashes to the downstream bug > tracker when really the right people to fix them are the upstream > developers. KCrash/DrKonqi is much better there. Well, upstream would want detailed backtraces, too. $ grep "Debuginfo absent" attachment.cgi\?id\=381101 | wc -l 188 $ grep "No symb" attachment.cgi\?id\=381101 | wc -l 64 Those 188+64 lines are half of the backtrace attachment already $ cat attachment.cgi\?id\=381101 | wc -l 517 | Debuginfo absent: 0011710bbf8990924b6dd2b256219d5682db6515 Instead of logging 188 missing debuginfo hashes which isn't useful, better log human-readable package EVRs. That would tell more about what package versions a reporter used. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
