Hi,
> No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current
> Mono.Cecil.
> And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not
> surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community?
I quite agree - there should be a universal mono.cecil.
> In any case, if you do think an exception should be granted, this will
> have
> to go through FESCo. But I doubt we will approve it, at least not if
> you
> don't provide evidence that somebody competent in C# tried to patch
> MonoDebugger to work with the new Mono.Cecil and failed due to some
> unsurmountable obstacle. If none of you Mono SIG folks is fluent in
> C#, then
> that's a problem that needs solving first of all.
MD itself works fine with Mono.Cecil as provided by other packages. The
problem is MD also copies Mono.Cecil to %{_libdir}/monodevelop/bin
which is what is being picked up on when -pkg:monodevelop is referenced
in the make file. It's not a problem with MD or Mono.Cecil really...
Oh well. I'll look at it (again) on the 28th.
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
