On 12/13/2009 06:16 AM, Christopher Brown wrote: > 2009/12/11 Adam Goode <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> We should definitely use Debian's key, right? Otherwise some Fedora CLI >> libraries would be unnecessarily incompatible with Debian, and whoever >> else uses Debian's key. >> >> The whole business of not shipping code-signing keys is a little >> contrary to open source. I think this is something that GPLv3 would >> prohibit. We should use a single well-known signing key for any package >> that we don't have the keys for, I think. > > You're right. > > This has already been resolved in devel by added mono.snk to the > mono-devel package. I'm just waiting on commit access to make the > required changes to F-11 and F-12 unless someone else wants to do it. > It looks like spot generated a new mono.snk. I was arguing to use Debian's mono.snk, for cross-distro compatibility. Shouldn't everyone should use Debian's key unless a package provides its own? Adam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
