2009/12/11 Adam Goode <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 11/29/2009 11:29 AM, Christopher Brown wrote: >> 2009/11/29 Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Hello, >> >> <snip> >> >>> Comments? >> >> I'm the maintainer for log4net but unfortunately not for nant. I've >> finally gotten around to looking at this. >> >> Debian have a policy[1] of using a standard mono.snk which is provided >> by a package (I guess we just then BuildRequires this) and I think >> this seems like a good solution but have no experience of this. >> > > We should definitely use Debian's key, right? Otherwise some Fedora CLI > libraries would be unnecessarily incompatible with Debian, and whoever > else uses Debian's key. > > The whole business of not shipping code-signing keys is a little > contrary to open source. I think this is something that GPLv3 would > prohibit. We should use a single well-known signing key for any package > that we don't have the keys for, I think. You're right. This has already been resolved in devel by added mono.snk to the mono-devel package. I'm just waiting on commit access to make the required changes to F-11 and F-12 unless someone else wants to do it. Best -- Christopher Brown -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
