Adam Williamson wrote:
> During FUDCon, we've been working on revising the Fedora release criteria.
> John Poelstra had already fleshed out a structure and much of the final
> content, and we've been revising and tweaking it in conjunction with QA
> (myself, Will Woods and James Laska), release engineering (Jesse Keating),
> anaconda team (especially Denise Dumas and Peter Jones) and desktop team
> (Christopher Aillon and Matthias Clasen, who provided suggestions at an
> earlier stage).
So once again things get decided by a small group of people in an in-person
meeting and whoever didn't happen to be at the right place at the right time
only gets to know the final decision after the fact? :-( I've complained
many times about this lack of transparency and I'll continue to do so.
Plus, why was the KDE SIG not invited? (We had at least 4 KDE SIG folks
present at FUDCon.) Are you planning to ship Fedora 13 even if the KDE Live
image is broken?
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
