Re: Fedora release criteria completely revised

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> So once again things get decided by a small group of people in an in-person 
> meeting and whoever didn't happen to be at the right place at the right time 
> only gets to know the final decision after the fact? :-( I've complained 
> many times about this lack of transparency and I'll continue to do so.

Please give the conspiracy theories a rest.  A meeting at a Fedora
conference is hardly a "lack of transparency".  Do you expect people to
attend a FUDCon, sit in a room, and not talk about anything Fedora
related, lest you be left out?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux