On 11/30/2009 01:10 PM, Peter Jones wrote: > On 11/30/2009 11:39 AM, Casey Dahlin wrote: >> On 11/30/2009 10:39 AM, Peter Jones wrote: >>> On 11/27/2009 02:25 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote: >>>> On 11/27/2009 06:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:28:19AM -0500, Gregory Maxwell >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> A literal zero prior to preprocessing is either a bug, or >>>>>> some kind of dead- code causing place-holder. >>>>> >>>>> Not necessarily .. the C code itself may be generated from >>>>> something else. >>>>> >>>>> Rich. >>>>> >>>> >>>> In which case the C code is no longer "source" and should be >>>> excluded from the analysis. >>> >>> No, when swig (or whatever) produces bad code, we still want the >>> compiler to identify it and toss it. It's then up to the packager >>> to realize it's swig producing the bad code, but it isn't magically >>> good code that doesn't result in real bugs. >>> >> >> The compiler isn't doing these checks, but point taken. > > Go read Jakub's reply again ;) > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-November/msg01966.html > I stand corrected. --CJD -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
