On 11/30/2009 11:39 AM, Casey Dahlin wrote: > On 11/30/2009 10:39 AM, Peter Jones wrote: >> On 11/27/2009 02:25 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote: >>> On 11/27/2009 06:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:28:19AM -0500, Gregory Maxwell >>>> wrote: >>>>> A literal zero prior to preprocessing is either a bug, or >>>>> some kind of dead- code causing place-holder. >>>> >>>> Not necessarily .. the C code itself may be generated from >>>> something else. >>>> >>>> Rich. >>>> >>> >>> In which case the C code is no longer "source" and should be >>> excluded from the analysis. >> >> No, when swig (or whatever) produces bad code, we still want the >> compiler to identify it and toss it. It's then up to the packager >> to realize it's swig producing the bad code, but it isn't magically >> good code that doesn't result in real bugs. >> > > The compiler isn't doing these checks, but point taken. Go read Jakub's reply again ;) https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-November/msg01966.html -- Peter Sanity's just a one trick pony anyway. You only get one trick -- rational thinking -- but when you're good and crazy, the sky's the limit! -- The Tick -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
