-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am packaging rasmol. The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we can consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are included that are licensed lgpl. Clearly, the finished rasmol binary is gplv2 since the lgpl parts are statically linked into the final binary. The final rpm does not provide separate .so files for those embedded libraries. I think that means that the .spec file should simply say License: GPLv2 Is that correct? http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-4.fc12.src.rpm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFLEDWvL6j7milTFsERAuuKAJ9CINOvg+n+2dZy3cIeqD0Ok529YQCXV7Xp W2A1e7R0E9Pw3NbXXHuazA== =1XT2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
