On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:25:27 -0800, Carl wrote: > The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we can > consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are > included that are licensed lgpl. This is covered by: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario > Clearly, the finished rasmol binary is > gplv2 The binary does not override the licensing of the source files it was built from. The licensing does not only apply to the binary but to the software as a whole. If some of the source files use a less restrictive licensing scheme, such as the LGPL, Fedora's current licensing guidelines want you to specifiy that with and "AND" in the License tag. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
