On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 11:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Upstream change or not, you're pissing off users to save 59k out of > >> however many gigabytes a minimal GNOME install is. I shouldn't really > >> presume to speak for others, but for me focus-follows-mouse is wired > >> into the fingertips --- it's not a negotiable UI change, it WILL cause > >> me to leave a distro. Or stop using GNOME, if they are stupid enough > >> to try to kill it altogether. > > > You're making the assumption that the change was made to save space. It > > wasn't. I can't find the original thread right now, but it's part of a > > cleanup on configuration tools. Upstream felt it no longer necessary to > > expose this, our Fedora maintainer decided to make it available via a > > subpackage. > > The question is why that package isn't part of the default install. > > regards, tom lane > Oversight, and/or design decision. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
