Re: Security policy oversight needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 10:03 -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:58:58AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > 
> > If this is the metric then we probably need to split "Desktop" into at
> > least 2 categories:
> > - Personal Laptop (Netbook/etc ...)
> > - Workstation (or multi-seat desktop, etc...)
> > 
> > These 2 categories have very different security requirements and implied
> > "ownership".
> 
> These two categories aren't at all distinct.  When I let others use my
> netbook, it becomes a multi-user workstation.

This is true in fact I very much prefer to have an admin group and an
"unprivileged users" group.
I was just replying in the context of what "Desktop" is considered.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux