Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Nov 17, 2009, at 21:21, Josephine Tannhäuser <josephine.tannhauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx m> wrote:

2009/11/17, Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
because renaming it will cause problems, for example.

foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.fc11

foo-1.0.fc11 > foo-1.0.fc10


foo-1.0.fc10
foo-1.0.f11

foo-1.0.f11 < foo-1.0.fc10

rpmdev-vercmp foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.fc10
0:foo-1.0.fc10 is newer


Imho your argument is obsolete, because we rebuild all Packages for
Massbranching, so the release is in every new branch higher, than in
the branch before!



Only temporarily. Quite frequently all branches of a package willsync up and be the same n-v-r where only the dist tag sets them apart.

--
Jes

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux