Re: A silly question about our "FC" tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/11/17, Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> because renaming it will cause problems, for example.
>
> foo-1.0.fc10
> foo-1.0.fc11
>
> foo-1.0.fc11 > foo-1.0.fc10
>
>
> foo-1.0.fc10
> foo-1.0.f11
>
> foo-1.0.f11 < foo-1.0.fc10
>
> rpmdev-vercmp foo-1.0.f11 foo-1.0.fc10
> 0:foo-1.0.fc10 is newer
>

Imho your argument is obsolete, because we rebuild all Packages for
Massbranching, so the release is in every new branch higher, than in
the branch before!


-- 
Josephine "Fine" Tannhäuser
2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 2.6.30.9-90.fc11.i586

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux