Re: Broken dependencies script at it again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Tom Lane writes:

Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
breaks?
I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package

Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.


Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future. 

--
Jes
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux