On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script
>
> altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it
>
> breaks?
>
> I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so
>
> that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
>
>
> Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
>
>
>
> Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future.
>
Anyone on the list irritated enough to work on these scripts or just
irritated enough to complain via email and let it be someone else's
problem?
-Mike
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
