On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > >> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script >>> altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it >>> breaks? >> >> I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so >> that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package > > Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken > dependencies. I would produce a report before sending any mails. A report suming up the occurrence of each missing dependency. Eyeballing the top slots of this list should highlight some obvious things to fix first like the /bin/sh one. You want to avoid reporting global or near global items on a per package basis. > > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Steve Traylen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
