2009/11/4 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>> "ST" == Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> ST> Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another >>> ST> /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some >>> ST> point. >>> >>> Turns out that the other queuing systems (torque and gridengine) have >>> already renamed their qstat binaries (to qstat-torque and qstat-ge). I >>> would expect that other queuing packages should do the same. >> > Yes a qstat-slurm with qstat as alternative across them. > Good news. but then the alternatives qstat conflicts with /usr/bin/qstat from the qstat rpm package, doesent it? kind regards, Rudolf Kastl > >> that means that the conflict tags in the qemu and the torque-clients >> package are invalid. >> >> thanks for checking jason! >> >> kind regards, >> Rudolf Kastl >>> >>> - J< >>> >>> -- >>> fedora-devel-list mailing list >>> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >>> >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >> > > > > -- > Steve Traylen > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
