>>>>> "RK" == Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx> writes: RK> 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there RK> anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a "conflicts RK> and forget" scenario? This one, I think, should be easily resolvable with alternatives. Actually I think all but a small number of the currently conflicting packages could be fixed up pretty easily. Currently it doesn't seem that there's any sort of enforcement outside of the original package review. The way around this is, of course, for someone to spend some time generating the current list of conflicting packages, proposing solutions, and working with FESCo in the case that those solutions are not applied. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
