On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>> "ST" == Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >> ST> Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another >> ST> /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some >> ST> point. >> >> Turns out that the other queuing systems (torque and gridengine) have >> already renamed their qstat binaries (to qstat-torque and qstat-ge). I >> would expect that other queuing packages should do the same. > Yes a qstat-slurm with qstat as alternative across them. Good news. > that means that the conflict tags in the qemu and the torque-clients > package are invalid. > > thanks for checking jason! > > kind regards, > Rudolf Kastl >> >> - J< >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >> > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Steve Traylen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
