Neal Becker wrote: > Jindrich Novy wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >>> Jindrich Novy wrote: >>> >>> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >>> >> I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set >>> >> TEXMFCNF, >>> >> so that other packages, such as xdvipdfmx will work? Or, should >>> >> texlive just obsolete xdvipdfmx and include it's own version? >>> > >>> > I will try to fix it in the texmf.cnf kpathsea configuration file >>> > directly in the new TL2009 update. >>> > >>> > Jindrich >>> > >>> Could you explain? >> >> The plan was to update the texmf.cnf to tell kpathsea to look for >> files in the /usr/share/texmf tree prior to the main TL2009 tree. This >> should make the utilities like xdvipdfmx work even though they are >> linked against old kpathsea and expects configuration bits in >> /usr/share/texmf. >> >>> Will you replace the current xdvipdfmx? >> >> Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate >> upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora. >> >> Jindrich >> > I am maintainer for xdvipdfmx and would be perfectly happy if you adopt > it. > s/adopt/obsolete -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
