On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Jindrich Novy wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > >> I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set > >> TEXMFCNF, > >> so that other packages, such as xdvipdfmx will work? Or, should texlive > >> just obsolete xdvipdfmx and include it's own version? > > > > I will try to fix it in the texmf.cnf kpathsea configuration file > > directly in the new TL2009 update. > > > > Jindrich > > > Could you explain? The plan was to update the texmf.cnf to tell kpathsea to look for files in the /usr/share/texmf tree prior to the main TL2009 tree. This should make the utilities like xdvipdfmx work even though they are linked against old kpathsea and expects configuration bits in /usr/share/texmf. > Will you replace the current xdvipdfmx? Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
