Jindrich Novy wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:30AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> Jindrich Novy wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> >> I wonder if texlive should include a /etc/profile.d package to set >> >> TEXMFCNF, >> >> so that other packages, such as xdvipdfmx will work? Or, should >> >> texlive just obsolete xdvipdfmx and include it's own version? >> > >> > I will try to fix it in the texmf.cnf kpathsea configuration file >> > directly in the new TL2009 update. >> > >> > Jindrich >> > >> Could you explain? > > The plan was to update the texmf.cnf to tell kpathsea to look for > files in the /usr/share/texmf tree prior to the main TL2009 tree. This > should make the utilities like xdvipdfmx work even though they are > linked against old kpathsea and expects configuration bits in > /usr/share/texmf. > >> Will you replace the current xdvipdfmx? > > Currently I'm trying to not to replace any package that has a separate > upstream and is already packaged separatelly in Fedora. > > Jindrich > I am maintainer for xdvipdfmx and would be perfectly happy if you adopt it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
