Re: texlive 2009 - should set TEXMFCNF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/10/29 José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Thursday 29 October 2009 17:26:25 Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
>> packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this by packaging
>> individual upstreams. The reason being that Fedora then benefits from
>> the integration and testing work done by the texlive team. The texlive
>> xdvipdfmx, for example is (I think), ahead of the 0.4 "upstream"
>> release.
>>
>> J.
>
> I am not sure if Jindrich is talking about this but the same could be said
> about the other pure latex packages. If the packages are available on texlive
> they could obsolete the previous versions available on Fedora.

Agreed.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux