Re: texlive 2009 - should set TEXMFCNF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 29 October 2009 17:26:25 Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> IMO I think we'd be better off adopting the texlive versions of the
> packages, rather than doing a half-and-half job on this by packaging
> individual upstreams. The reason being that Fedora then benefits from
> the integration and testing work done by the texlive team. The texlive
> xdvipdfmx, for example is (I think), ahead of the 0.4 "upstream"
> release.
> 
> J.

I am not sure if Jindrich is talking about this but the same could be said 
about the other pure latex packages. If the packages are available on texlive 
they could obsolete the previous versions available on Fedora.

-- 
José Abílio

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux