Rudolf Kastl wrote:
2009/10/7 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with
the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be
essentially a Spin of stock Fedora. It also helps OLPC devs who don't
necessarily have XOs.
IIRC, they already are shipping stock Fedora in their latest builds
except for the kernel. They are also responsible for the largest amount
of Fedora deployments in the world. So it is all mutually beneficial.
That is correct, we're all upstream now with no weird branches for
core packages :-)
Thats great to hear and interesting information. In no way the
question was meant as criticism. Basically i was just curious if the
packages are hardware related to the olpc hw or generally useful.
Thanks for your answer. Best wishes for the olpc/sugar developers.
More knowledge and therefor power to the poor kids.
<raises beer stein> My thanks to all concerned.
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
Peter
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
