2009/10/7 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram > <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/06/2009 05:35 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> Additionally, having OLPC-specific RPMS in mainline Fedora helps with >>> the end goal that is , as I understand it, to have OLPC's OS be >>> essentially a Spin of stock Fedora. It also helps OLPC devs who don't >>> necessarily have XOs. >> >> IIRC, they already are shipping stock Fedora in their latest builds >> except for the kernel. They are also responsible for the largest amount >> of Fedora deployments in the world. So it is all mutually beneficial. > > That is correct, we're all upstream now with no weird branches for > core packages :-) Thats great to hear and interesting information. In no way the question was meant as criticism. Basically i was just curious if the packages are hardware related to the olpc hw or generally useful. Thanks for your answer. Best wishes for the olpc/sugar developers. More knowledge and therefor power to the poor kids. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl > > Peter > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
