On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/10/6 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl <che666@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> yum list all |grep olpc >>> dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide >>> olpc-contents.x86_64 2.6-2.fc12 rawhide >>> olpc-library.noarch 2.0.2-2.fc12 rawhide >>> olpc-netutils.noarch 0.7-4.fc12 rawhide >>> olpc-switch-desktop.noarch 0.6-2.fc12 rawhide >>> olpc-update.noarch 2.20-1.fc12 rawhide >>> olpc-utils.x86_64 1.0.3-2.fc12 rawhide >>> >>> does it really make sense to have those modules available on >>> x86/x86_64? (this is from rawhide) >> >> Yes, because they are used on both x86 and x86_64 platforms. What is >> the problem having them there? >> >> Peter > > somehow i had the impression they are atleast partially related to the > olpc hardware. Those ones aren't necessarily, and even then why does that stop them from being in rawhide. There's lots of packages for specific hardware in Fedora and these devices run Fedora. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
