Re: status of forked zlibs in rsync and zsync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/29/2009 01:51 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:53:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
>> Secondly, where would be the appropriate place to propose accepting
>> zsync with the internal zlib? Is that something I should bring to the
>> packaging committee?
> 
> This proposal has already been declined by FESCo:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134

Since now that the rsync maintainer isn't willing to do the work (not
that I blame him) nor has anyone volunteered, what does FESCo's decision
mean exactly? Are we removing rsync from the distribution? I hope not.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux