Re: Packaging Webmin for Fedora 11+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Already made the decision to remove the file when building and have
spoken to Jamie Cameron, he will stop distributing these in his
packages.

But that was not really what I was after. This feature of detecting
binary files in noarch packages seems to be fairly new. I was wondering
how I can tell rpmbuild to include such files in an rpm package
explicitly?

On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:04 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
> > I have run into a problem when trying to package webmin for Fedora 11+.
> > Webmin is a noarch package but it contains some binary files
> > (effectively firmware) it is a dll that gets downloaded onto Windows
> > based browsers.
> 
> xenroll.dll?  It's hardly firmware - copyright microsoft and almost
> certainly not redistributable.  The safest option is probably to
> remove it completely (from the source tarball too).
> 
> And if you haven't seen them already, I'd also recommend taking a look
> at the previous review requests for webmin - it's not the easiest
> thing to get packaged properly
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184080
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570
> 
> -- 
> Iain.
> 
-- 
Howard Wilkinson <howard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Coherent Technology Limited

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux