Re: GCC var-tracking-assignments: testing and bug reports appreciated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 11, 2009, John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not fast enough to avoid a two-day slip in rawhide kernels.

?!?

A work-around that enabled a successful kernel build was offered within
minutes.  A patch that fixed the bug was offered within hours.  A GCC
with the fix was available about half a day after the initial bug
report, and the kernel built with the newer GCC (but without newer debug
info) was already available at that point.

>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521322

This bug was opened before the new GCC.  Exactly *one* kernel build
failed because of the new GCC feature.  I can't find any evidence that
this bug is in any way related with VTA or with the new GCC.

So how do you get from “GCC debug info was fixed, with one kernel build
and a few hours as casualty” to “two-day slip in rawhide kernels”?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux