On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 21:27 +0000, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes: > > This is my issue too. There is claim that it was tested, yet it wasn't > > tested in the same place we require every other feature to be tested, > > that being rawhide. > > Although it obviously would have been far nicer to have had this all in before > the mass rebuild, there were multiple test builds against rawhide packages. I > did a build of the rawhide kernel package using jakub's gcc-vta and lxo used > that to post results of testing to the gcc list, which helped get it accepted > upstream, which is a requirement for it to make it into fedora, etc. Sorry, this > wasn't more visible. Wierdly the first package that broke when this was pushed was the kernel ;-) Dave. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
