2009/9/2 Matthew Saltzman <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 18:50 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> 2009/9/1 Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your >> >> package provides 11.84. >> > >> > AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is >> > another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or >> > the texlive version. >> > >> > In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as >> > each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class. >> > >> >> Actually, there is an option to install the AucTeX bundled preview >> privately for auctex. so both versions could co-exist, if we wanted to >> do that (although that's not my recommendation). > > Meanwhile, is there a workaround? I can install the right tex-preview > alongside texlive-preview, but still can't install the old dvipng and > kpathsea to get emacs-auctex. That kpathsea wants texlive-2007. > I don't see an easy one without rebuilding emacs-auctex against Jindrich's new packages, and that's not an option for the main F-11 repo. One the new texlive is in rawhide, we can fix this stuff up there. J. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
