2009/8/31 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems >> like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and >> obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex >> contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should >> successfully obsolete it. > > But doing installation that way, I end up with both installed: > > tex-preview-11.85-8.fc11.noarch > texlive-preview-2009-11.84.13530.fc11.noarch > > Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your > package provides 11.84. AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or the texlive version. In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class. Jonathan (emacs-auctex maintainer). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
