Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/8/31 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems
>> like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and
>> obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex
>> contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should
>> successfully obsolete it.
>
> But doing installation that way, I end up with both installed:
>
> tex-preview-11.85-8.fc11.noarch
> texlive-preview-2009-11.84.13530.fc11.noarch
>
> Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your
> package provides 11.84.

AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is
another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or
the texlive version.

In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as
each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class.

Jonathan (emacs-auctex maintainer).

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux