On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 18:50 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> 2009/9/1 Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your
> >> package provides 11.84.
> >
> > AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is
> > another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or
> > the texlive version.
> >
> > In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as
> > each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class.
> >
>
> Actually, there is an option to install the AucTeX bundled preview
> privately for auctex. so both versions could co-exist, if we wanted to
> do that (although that's not my recommendation).
Meanwhile, is there a workaround? I can install the right tex-preview
alongside texlive-preview, but still can't install the old dvipng and
kpathsea to get emacs-auctex. That kpathsea wants texlive-2007.
Thanks.
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
