On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:37 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: > > sorry, I meant 'orphaned' in the sense that its listed maintainer is no > > longer appropriate - it needs to have the listed maintainer changed to > > an appropriate person / group. > > Wouldn't that be to the current maintainer to say so? sure, if the 'gecko-maint' group is happy to maintain a non-gecko component, that's fine (though may look a bit confusing). I just wanted to flag the issue up, as Epiphany is a quite important package (it's GNOME's official browser, even if we ship Firefox on our 'desktop' spin). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
