On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that > > > > Epiphany is effectively orphaned: > > > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/epiphany > > > > > > > > it is owned by gecko-maint, but since it's now based on Webkit, that > > > > makes no sense, and I see no reason to expect the Gecko maintainers > > > > group to care about Epiphany. > > > > > > > > It seems like whoever controls the 'gecko-maint' group should formally > > > > orphan Epiphany, and someone else should pick it up. > > > > > > > > For reference, the bug I was reporting was > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516938 . > > > > > > > > > > I'd say you are making stuff up based on a throwaway comment of mine... > > > > Making what up? How does it make sense for a project that's no longer > > based on Gecko to be maintained by the Gecko maintainers group? > > Well, what you said was different, namely that it is not maintained at > all. sorry, I meant 'orphaned' in the sense that its listed maintainer is no longer appropriate - it needs to have the listed maintainer changed to an appropriate person / group. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
