Re: Epiphany effectively orphaned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that
> > Epiphany is effectively orphaned:
> > 
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/epiphany
> > 
> > it is owned by gecko-maint, but since it's now based on Webkit, that
> > makes no sense, and I see no reason to expect the Gecko maintainers
> > group to care about Epiphany.
> > 
> > It seems like whoever controls the 'gecko-maint' group should formally
> > orphan Epiphany, and someone else should pick it up.
> > 
> > For reference, the bug I was reporting was
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516938 .
> > 
> 
> I'd say you are making stuff up based on a throwaway comment of mine...

Making what up? How does it make sense for a project that's no longer
based on Gecko to be maintained by the Gecko maintainers group?

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux