On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:58 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > It also would require multiple CVS branches, one for security, one for > adventurous, as well as different buildroots to go along with those, > since you wouldn't be able to build a security update for a gnome > package against the newer adventurous gtk and expect it to work on the > older GTK, likewise if you had to modify a gnome package to work with > newer gtk, you dont' want those modifications in the way if/when you > need to do a conservative security update for it later. Oh I forgot, you also need -testing versions of each of those repos, so for any release, you could have updates, updates-testing, experimental, and experimental-testing repo options and build targets and buildroot shuffling going on. WHAT FUN! -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) identi.ca (http://identi.ca/jkeating)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
